Beehive Homes Of Broken Arrow

What the state also noted

• — The center's first plan of correction was rejected by the state as exceeding 60 days from the survey exit; an amended plan was accepted on 06/27/2025. Note that the acceptance letter is dated 06/27/2025 but records an alleged compliance date of 06/11/2025, which had already passed.
• — The Broken Arrow fire inspection report dated 04/23/2025 is in the file, but its violation, notes and location columns are blank or unreadable in the scan. 'Clearance' is the center's own wording in its plan of correction; the state's acceptance of that clearance cannot be verified from these documents.
• — This is a facility with real citations, not a clean record. Six deficiencies were cited at the 04/15/2025 survey: no follow-up on 2025 fire inspection deficiencies (widespread, across the community), inadequate nursing supervision (widespread, across the community), missing first aid/CPR training documentation for 4 of 5 sampled staff files, no documented quarterly quality assurance meetings from 08/22/24 through 03/15/25, a refrigerated medication (lorazepam) stored at room temperature in one of two medication carts, and background checks completed after rather than before hire for 4 of 5 sampled files.
• — Only one survey (04/15/2025) exists in the 24-month window, so no improvement over time can be measured.
• — The staffing citation was serious in scope: 'there were residents observed in the television area near front door with no staff supervision,' and one family member reported another resident fell in their family member's room and 'it was four hours before they could get anyone to help.' A resident, two home health aides, the ombudsman, two family members, and the executive director all raised staffing concerns; the executive director stated they did feel they needed more staff.
• — One of the four complaints (OK00080484) alleged that 'the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent a fall with a major injury.' The record does not state whether that allegation was substantiated, and the surveyors' fall-related observations appear under the staffing citation rather than as a separate finding.
• — At least two complaint allegations correspond to citations: short staffing (the staffing rule) and staff training for assigned tasks (the training rule — first aid/CPR training missing for 4 of 5 sampled files). The 'one substantiated complaint' figure is an inference and may understate the true count.
• — The investigative reports carry a substantiated/not-substantiated marking column that is only partly legible in the scan. Three of the four investigative reports show no legible markings at all, so substantiation for the two abuse complaints and the fall complaint cannot be read from this record.
• — No revisit or verification-of-correction letter appears in this record, so there is no state confirmation in these documents that any of the six problems were fixed.